Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links — at no extra cost to you. It never affects our reviews or the public Trust Score.
Quick Answer: To screen ETFs on ES, NQ, and crude oil futures, check expense ratios, volume, and tracking error. SPY tracks ES, QQQ tracks NQ, USO tracks crude. But USO suffers from contango. Use Finviz or Morningstar for quick comparisons. I prefer direct futures for control, but ETFs work for simple exposure.
| Market | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| US indices | S&P 500, NASDAQ, Dow Jones | NYSE / NASDAQ |
| Regulator | CFTC (futures) / SEC (securities) | Official |
| Prop firm model | Funded evaluations with profit split 70-95% | Vendor terms |
| Verification | Updated regularly | PropFirmDiscountApp |
| Best deal today | Code DISCOUNTAPP — up to 90% off | Updated regularly |
ETFs on futures give you exposure without a futures account. But not all ETFs are equal. ES and NQ ETFs hold stocks, not futures. Crude oil ETFs like USO hold actual futures contracts. The tracking error can be large. You need to screen for costs and liquidity. A bad pick can cost you 1-2% per year in hidden fees.
Focus on three numbers: expense ratio, average daily volume, and tracking error. Expense ratio eats returns. Volume ensures you can enter and exit. Tracking error shows how closely the ETF follows the future. I look for expense ratios below 0.3% and volume above 1 million shares. Here is a comparison of popular ETFs:
Start with Finviz for volume and price. Then check Morningstar for expense ratio and tracking error. Use etf.com for premium/discount data. My 5 tips: 1) Always compare the ETF's performance to the future over 6 months. 2) Avoid ETFs with less than $100 million in assets. 3) Check the roll schedule for commodity ETFs. 4) Use limit orders to avoid premium spikes. 5) Re-screen quarterly because fees change.
USO is a bad deal for long-term holds. The roll cost from contango eats 3-5% per year. DBO is slightly better but still suffers. For ES and NQ, avoid leveraged ETFs like UPRO if you hold overnight. They decay due to volatility. Stick to SPY and QQQ for simple tracking. Futures accounts are cheaper if you trade often.
Most prop firms like FTMO, Apex, and Topstep focus on futures, not ETFs. But you can use them to trade ES and NQ futures directly. If you prefer ETFs, you need a regular broker. However, FTMO offers a solid evaluation for futures traders. Use code FTMO10 for 10% off. Original price for a 100k account is $540, now $486. Click here: https://ftmo.com/?ref=discount
| Ticker | Underlying Future | Expense Ratio | Avg Volume (shares) | Tracking Error (1yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | ES (S&P 500) | 0.09% | 70,000,000 | 0.05% |
| QQQ | NQ (Nasdaq 100) | 0.20% | 30,000,000 | 0.10% |
| USO | CL (Crude Oil) | 0.79% | 5,000,000 | 1.50% |
| BNO | Brent Crude | 0.95% | 200,000 | 1.80% |
| DBO | CL (Crude Oil) | 0.79% | 100,000 | 2.10% |
USO is the most liquid but has high roll costs. DBO uses a different strategy and can be better for short-term trades.
No. They are taxed as commodities or collectibles, often at a higher rate. Futures contracts get 60/40 tax treatment, which is better.
Most roll monthly, usually during the week before expiration. Check the fund's prospectus for exact dates.
No. Most prop firms only allow direct futures trading. Use a regular brokerage account for ETFs.
USO's tracking error over the last year was about 1.5% due to contango and management fees. It can be higher in volatile markets.
Screening ETFs on futures takes five minutes. Check expense ratio, volume, and tracking error. Avoid USO for long holds. Use direct futures for better tax treatment and lower costs. Want to trade futures? Try FTMO with code FTMO10 for 10% off. Start now.
All firms · Today's offers · FTMO vs Apex
Discount codes and expiry dates are always shown before checkout. See how we rank firms on our methodology page.
PropFirmDiscountApp · Discount codes with expiry dates · See today's offers

Risk warning: Trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prop firm evaluations are simulations, not regulated brokerage accounts.