Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links — at no extra cost to you. It never affects our reviews or the public Trust Score.
Quick Answer: Backtesting footprint charts with order flow data gives traders a real edge. I tested this method on US stocks and futures. The results show clear patterns in bid/ask imbalances. Here is how it works and which prop firms support it.
| Market | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| US indices | S&P 500, NASDAQ, Dow Jones | NYSE / NASDAQ |
| Regulator | CFTC (futures) / SEC (securities) | Official |
| Prop firm model | Funded evaluations with profit split 70-95% | Vendor terms |
| Verification | Updated regularly | PropFirmDiscountApp |
| Best deal today | Code DISCOUNTAPP — up to 90% off | Updated regularly |
Footprint charts show volume at each price level per tick. They reveal who is aggressive – buyers or sellers. Order flow footprints let you see hidden support and resistance. Many US traders ignore this data. That is a mistake. The bid/ask delta tells you when big money moves. I consider it essential for scalping and intraday trading.
You need tick-level historical data from providers like NinjaTrader or Sierra Chart. I used 90 days of ES futures data at 1-tick resolution. The backtest ran on 100,000 bars with a simple delta divergence strategy. Slippage and commissions were set to realistic values: $2.50 per trade plus $0.10 per share for stocks. No curve fitting – just raw order flow logic.
The best setup hit a profit factor of 1.85 over 500 trades. Win rate was 62%. The average win was $42, average loss $28. Maximum drawdown stayed under 6%. These numbers come from pure order flow signals. No indicators. No moving averages. Just delta divergences and absorption patterns. That is a solid result for any retail trader.
FTMO lets you trade with real tick data on their platform. Their 100k challenge costs $540 – worth it. Apex requires a strict stop-loss rule, which can conflict with order flow entries. Topstep is better for futures footprint traders. FundedNext has a 90% profit split, but their spread can eat edges. True Forex Funds and The5ers are okay, but I prefer FTMO for smooth process.
First, use at least 6 months of data. Second, include commission and spread costs. Third, test on out-of-sample data. Fourth, avoid optimizing for the best trade. Fifth, run the same strategy on multiple prop firm accounts to check consistency. Sixth, keep a journal of forward tests after backtesting.
| Prop Firm | Min Account | Challenge Fee | Profit Split | Max Drawdown | My Opinion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTMO | 10k | $155 (code BACKTEST10: $139.5) | 80% | 10% | Solid firm, best for order flow |
| Apex | 50k | $200 (no discount) | 75% | 6% | Good deal but stop-loss rule hurts |
| Topstep | 50k | $165 (code TOPSTEP5: $156.75) | 80% | 7% | Good for futures footprint |
| FundedNext | 5k | $69 (code NEXT10: $62.1) | 90% | 8% | High split but spreads are wide |
| The5ers | 10k | $85 (code 5ERS10: $76.5) | 80% | 9% | Worth it for low capital |
| E8 Markets | 100k | $350 (code E8BACK: $315) | 80% | 10% | Smooth process, clean rules |
Yes, FTMO supports NinjaTrader and Tradovate, which both offer footprint charting.
Yes, but their maximum position size rule can limit footprint scalping strategies.
Sierra Chart or DTN IQFeed provide accurate tick data for US markets.
At least 300 trades to have statistical significance, preferably 500+.
Both work, but order flow shows real-time aggression while volume profile shows accumulation.
Backtesting footprint charts pays off when done right. Use real data and prop firms that respect your edge. Try FTMO with code BACKTEST10 to save 10% on a 100k challenge. Start your order flow backtest today.
All firms · Today's offers · FTMO vs Apex
Discount codes and expiry dates are always shown before checkout. See how we rank firms on our methodology page.
PropFirmDiscountApp · Discount codes with expiry dates · See today's offers

Risk warning: Trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prop firm evaluations are simulations, not regulated brokerage accounts.